Back To Top

Back to Top

Comment

Comment
Share

Evolution | The “Fact” Based Theory

Deon
November 19, 2013

evolution_of_man

If you ask many Atheists & Agnostics how humans came into existence,
around 95% of them will say Evolution.

But upon Further Investigation, Ray Comfort (a New-Zealand born Christian Minister)ray

has helped the Atheist Community to SEE that Darwinian Evolution is indeed not FACT as many will insist, but it is instead a form of FAITH.

Watch The Video Below To See This Amazing Documentary!

** Leave Your COMMENTS below! **

Deon

Deon

Founder at DeonVsEarth
Deon is a Thought-Leader, Philosopher, Researcher, Entrepreneur, Internet marketer, and Social-Media extraordinaire.

After spending years studying the inner workings of the Cyber world, Deon has been given many titles as a direct result of his expertise on a wide array of platforms -- both online and off.

But whether the subject is Marketing, Advertising, Blogging, Branding, Web Metrics, Systems Design, Advanced Social-Media integration, Research, or Investigation -- Deon has definitely earned a prominent name for himself within the cyber community.

However, the only title he actually values is... "Christian"
Deon

  • monkone

    Ok, where does he actually address evolution? As far as I can tell all he’s doing is highlighting how a lot of people who don’t study biology are saying evolution is a fact when in truth all they can actually do is believe in the people who are studying it, aka, have faith.
    Which is fine. Bares no reflection on whether evolution is actually true or false but if we’re going to pick nits on specifics…

    I don’t get this whole “evolution or God” dichotomy, especially when people call into question moral issues as a reason for evolution being false.

    It’s like saying a car can’t go fast because it’s not painted the right colour. In other words, a separate issue.

    • He Addresses It throughout the Video!

      Watch It again & REALLY LISTEN!

      I think your brain is so RESISTANT to what he is trying to say that it is not allowing you to grasp his message.

      Darwinian Evolution suggests that a change of KINDS can occur….. example: a Gnat Turning into a WHALE over millions of years

      But in order for something to be scientific it must be…

      1. Observable
      2. Repeatable

      The ONLY observations made by Darwinists is NOT the change of KINDS (because it takes millions of years),

      But Rather, ADAPTATION. ( Birds turning into other BIRDS, Fish turning into other FISH )

      And because Evolution takes MILLIONS of years, It cannot be OBSERVABLE for ANY human simply because we are incapable of living that long.

      So because Evolution is neither

      1. Observable
      2. Repeatable

      It cannot be proven by SCIENCE. Therefore it is not SCIENTIFIC

      But it is a BELIEF SYSTEM founded on FAITH.

  • monkone

    Ok, where does he actually address evolution? As far as I can tell all he’s doing is highlighting how a lot of people who don’t study biology are saying evolution is a fact when in truth all they can actually do is believe in the people who are studying it, aka, have faith.
    Which is fine. Bares no reflection on whether evolution is actually true or false but if we’re going to pick nits on specifics…

    I don’t get this whole “evolution or God” dichotomy, especially when people call into question moral issues as a reason for evolution being false.

    It’s like saying a car can’t go fast because it’s not painted the right colour. In other words, a separate issue.

  • Michael Smith

    I don’t ever question the faith vs facts, the two are by definition incompatible. I only question the failed reasoning that leads people to believe they can understand creation better by reading a book edited many times over thousands of years and written in the language of men than they can by examining the rocks and bones of the Earth, a story that can only be written by creation itself.

    Want to talk about it sometime?

  • Michael Smith

    I don’t ever question the faith vs facts, the two are by definition incompatible. I only question the failed reasoning that leads people to believe they can understand creation better by reading a book edited many times over thousands of years and written in the language of men than they can by examining the rocks and bones of the Earth, a story that can only be written by creation itself.

    Want to talk about it sometime?